School by Design

Inspiring student-centered, intentionally designed schools

3 Layers of Learning Design Thinking

Leave a comment

Teaching Design Thinking is one of the most exciting trends I’m seeing in K-12 schools. Not only is it a great way to engage students in solving real-world problems, but it also develops their problem solving skills, their creative confidence, collaboration abilities and the list goes on. I’m currently developing a Design Thinking curriculum for a great organization, and I developed this visual to represent the different layers that a class on Design Thinking addresses. The main thing to note is that the class should not ultimately be only about Process Execution or even Process Skills, because the real power of Design Thinking is in the Process Attitudes.

Hope you find it helpful – and I would love your feedback! (in the comments or on twitter @EmanAbouelatta)

Layers of Design Thinking


Leave a comment

3 Amazing Schools Re-imagining Education | What, How and Why they do it!

In my endeavor to find and learn from school models that work, I started The Amazing School Tour. I visit schools, speak to their staff and students and attend their classes, then document their inspiring practices. Here are three of these amazing schools!

Want to jump to a school? Epic Middle School. Design Tech High School. The Clearwater School.

Epic Middle School

Epic Middle School. Oakland, CA.
Based in one of Oakland CA’s poorest and highest crime neighborhoods, Epic School re-imagines middle school, making classes into magical worlds and lessons heroic quests, “gamifying” learning and creating a narrative around school more compelling than the neighborhood’s prevalent gang narrative.

1. An EPIC Hero’s Quest

Epic School emphasizes students’ identities as Heroes, who not only have ownership over their journey, but who also have the tools to embark on their quests. There’s a constant “quest” that runs parallel to the daily learning, where students engage in problem solving, teamwork and use of content knowledge to progress in their adventure. They may find hints in their English reading or in a messy corner in their classroom which means they’re constantly engaged, looking for the next hidden quest to solve or a tool that can help them. For example, this is all they got on their first day of school – can you figure it out?

A Hero's Journey

2. Badges
Gamification is integral to the school culture, and is used to encourage and acknowledge skills that are not content-focused. Students wear their badges in pride, and strive to get more! The main badges are: Catalyst, Engineer and Advocate. Combinations of these badges develop your identity further: Catalyst + Advocate = Activist. I think the biggest value of this badging system is the potential it holds in helping students see themselves through a lens beyond grades, and feel appreciated for the skills they bring to the school that usually go unacknowledged. Another amazing advantage is that you “earn” these badges – you start from zero and work your way up, unlike grades where it’s always a deficit model: every mistake is punished by a decreased grade. Little wins = higher engagement. Go badges!

3. Houses
a. Students often have a strong commitment to their peers, many times even stronger than the commitment to adults in school. Epic capitalizes on this by developing a sense of shared responsibility in students through grouping them in houses, where they sometimes engage in quests together and individual wins benefit the whole house. If a student in a house helps a friend, the whole house gets points that go towards an end reward. JK Rowling got it right 🙂 10 points for Gryffindor!

Houses

4. Scaffolding Innovation
Epic integrates aspects of the design process in their design and engineering lab. I was extremely impressed by how they thought about scaffolding innovation. Often times, schools adopt the design process and expect students to magically thrive, innovate and develop self-directed abilities. But Epic knows better: they have developed curriculum that scaffolds this process, developing students’ abilities as they increase their autonomy. In a nutshell, the approach is: 1. Start with a Directed Project and Directed Process, 2. Directed Process and Undirected Project, 3. Undirected Process and Undirected Project.

Back to top



Epic Middle School

Design Tech High School. Milbrae, CA.

Design Tech High School aims to develop innovation-ready students who hold skills critical to success in the 21st century.The two principles that guide Design Tech High School are extreme personalization and putting knowledge in action. Extreme personalization through self-paced learning, and knowledge in action through teaching students to solve real-world problems using Design Thinking.

1. D.lab: Design, every day!

Design Thinking is a human-centered, creative problem solving approach that is used in some of the most innovative organizations around the world. Every day, d.Tech students spend time using the Design Thinking process to solve a real-world problem: they interview people, they collaborate to identify needs, generate ideas for solutions and prototype them. Their ‘Design Challenges” range from “Making Halloween more safe” to “Designing the Milbrae Morning”. Design Thinking holds a lot of potential in developing students’ empathy, self-efficacy, problem-solving and creative confidence. As one student put it – “I found my inner creative person and I realized I can have great ideas”. Another student said “I am now better at going up to strangers and interviewing them; I used to just hide behind my friends, but I’m getting better”. It was amazingly inspiring to attend students’ end-of-course presentations because they were NOT demonstrating content mastery, instead they were reflecting on their growth as individuals.

d.lab

From d.tech Flickr feed. Photo credit: Kerry Bitner

2. @d.tech: Community, every day!
Students’ social and emotional development is often overshadowed by high stakes testing and SAT scores in High School – but not at d.tech! Every day, students meet with their group and advisor to explore their emotional, social and physical needs. One session a week (Group Therapy, as students affectionately call it) is dedicated to an open discussion of issues that students contribute anonymously. The advisor steps back as students offer advice, support and strategies to cope with the issue being discussed. Issues range from Finding motivation to do school work to Resolving issues with friends. Another session is dedicated to physical wellness – like sleep or healthy eating habits. This time not only builds community among students, but also develops strong bonds with their advisor, who often develops into their mentor.

14540912838_5aacf576ff_z

From d.tech Flickr feed. Photo credit: Kerry Bitner

3. Flex Schedule
Stemming from its commitment to extreme personalization, d.tech ditched the school schedule. Every week, students receive a new schedule of classes that was developed specifically for them. Why? Because students progress differently, their needs for 1)length of instruction time, 2)type of instruction, and 3)independent learning time vary. So, rather than treat all students the same, d.tech takes on the operational nightmare of creating an individualized schedule every week! How? Teachers spend half of their Friday analyzing student performance and developing a personalized plan for their week: a period of group instruction to review some material they’re struggling with, a number of Learning Hubs where they can independently work and a check-in with the teacher to discuss their performance.

4. Constant Prototype
Perhaps the most inspiring part of d.tech is the prevalent culture of prototyping. I remember Ken Montgomery, the principal, saying “Design Tech should not look the same in 5 years. It should be completely different; constantly evolving to meet student needs”. Teachers and administrators constantly experiment with processes, assessment, engagement methods, and even space. One of the great lessons I learnt from d.tech staff is the importance of building room for experimentation upfront: their furniture is modular and provides flexibility, so they can try different classroom setups when they need to. If the furniture was bolted to the ground, it would have been much harder to prototype solutions. Same with teacher time: although the teaching staff is a small team, they’ve considered administrators and volunteers as additional resources from day one, which means they can get that extra hand when they need it to try something new.

Back to top


The Clearwater School

The Clearwater School. Bothel, WA.

The Clearwater School is part of an international network based on the Sudbury Valley School in Massachusetts. Sudbury schools are run democratically, ensuring that each student’s voice is heard and valued. Children are trusted with the freedom and responsibility to direct their own education.

1. Student-Run – really!
What happens when a student violates school rules? How does a school examine a proposal for a new program? How does a new policy get developed? Answers to these questions will almost always include School leadership, parents and teachers, but in Clearwater the answer is always STUDENTS. Clearwater, like all Sudbury schools, is run by the student body through two entities: the Judicial Committee and School Meetings – both run by a constantly rotating body of students, with one staff advisor. The Judicial Committee reviews complaints, submitted by any person in the school, listens to both parties, reviews the school rule book, and decides what actions to take. The School Meeting is where proposals for policies or decisions are discussed: students review the budget, the rule book, assess the proposal and make a decision. This setup develops students’ ability to problem solve, think critically, speak publicly and most importantly become active, responsible citizens who have a strong sense of ownership towards their community (aka school). Let this sink in: STUDENTS run the school.

From Clearwater School blog.

From Clearwater School blog.

2. Room for Passion
The Sudbury model (on which Clearwater School is based) is definitely very “radical” when compared to most schools. There are no classes, and students decide what to do with their time – no caveats or exceptions. Staff may decide to run a workshop or start a discussion on a subject interesting to them (drumming, fishing, democracy, quadratic equations), but it’s up to the students to participate or not. Regardless of different opinions about the model, one thing remains true: it leaves room for students to develop and explore their passions. During my visit, I passed by a group of three teenage girls who had a camera setup and were experimenting with their first video podcast. “What’s it about?” I asked, “We don’t know”, they said, “We’ll start and see what happens. Probably about things we care about”. Then they told Stephanie – the co-founder, staff member and my amazing host for the day – that they’ll use the School Meeting to ask the community to allow them to reserve the room weekly, since no one did that before and they wanted to make sure it’s their right to do so. They may end up experimenting with the podcasts for months, or stop next week, but it’s up to them. They have the time and space to explore this potential passion, and the freedom to decide whether or not it’s for them.

3. Earning Autonomy
Clearwater School provide students with a lot of autonomy, but they have to earn it. And earning it involves clear steps and bars that you have to pass. Initially, you ask permission before using the art room, until you demonstrate that you consistently clean up after you are done, and keep the tools in good shape. Afterwards, you can use it freely. Younger students initially have to be accompanied by an older student/adult when they’re outside. When they learn the guidelines of outside play, they can go outside after letting an older student/adult know. When they do this consistently enough, and demonstrate that they stay within the “outside play guidelines”, it means that they’re ready to take on more responsibility and move freely in the outside area. The school maintains its safety procedures, but it makes sure that the need for safety doesn’t interfere with students’ autonomy and growth. Super student-centered, right? Not a surprise, since all these policies were developed and constantly improved by students during School Meetings.

4. Purpose-driven Learning
Of course, the ultimate question is: “How do they learn anything?” One thing is definitely true about Clearwater: their students take more responsibility for their learning than students in traditional schools. Why? Because it’s always their decision to learn. Stephanie told me about her son, a graduate of the school, who decided to start an SAT class when he decided he wants to go to college. It was hard, but it was purposeful, so he did it. Students practice purpose-driven learning everyday: if they’re fascinated by a topic or they want to build or make something, they figure out the resources they need to do it, which almost always include learning something. They build a habit of turning a “need-to-know” into knowledge. They see this behavior constantly modeled by other students and school staff, they ask for help from those role-models if they need to figure out a path to achieve their goal, and they are motivated to learn, so they do it. They learn.

Purpose-driven learning

From Clearwater School blog.

Back to top


Inspired? Inspire!

These are three of the amazing schools I’m inspired by in my Amazing School Tour. If you found inspiration in their practices, LET ME KNOW! Leave a comment here or @EmanAbouelatta on twitter. 

Also, I’m sure there are practices that inspire you in a school – tell me about them! The Amazing School Tour would love to have more destinations!

Back to top


Leave a comment

How to Design a Growth-Minded School

How Might We design a school that encourages, nurtures and teaches a Growth Mindset? From Curriculum to Culture, here is a School By Design!

Mindsets Infographic

Growth vs. Fixed Mindset. From The Guardian. (Link in footer)

*This post is based on Carol Dweck’s Growth Mindset theory. For a quick overview, please see this online book review or the Official Mindsets website. An excerpt of the book review is at the end of this article.

Design Principles

  • Growth mindset is encouraged and developed for all stakeholders (students, teachers and staff).
  • Growth Mindset is an integral Key Performance Indicator of all of the school’s activities, since it is a fundamental part of the school’s philosophy (Curriculum, Assessment, Teacher evaluation, School performance).
  • Growth Mindset is treated as:
    • A learning objective for students.
    • A philosophy guiding instruction.
    • A philosophy guiding assessment, feedback and reward systems.
    • A philosophy guiding professional development of teachers and staff
    • A philosophy guiding teacher performance evaluation.
    • A criterion in organizational performance evaluation.
  • In a nutshell: We should embody it. We should teach it. We should asses through it.

School Design

1. Assessment: 
Growth Mindset is not about the momentary success, but rather is about an intentional will to continuously improve, even if one is succeeding according to a certain standard. Therefore, students and teachers should not be automatically satisfied with an “A”, or be completely devastated with a “B-“. The students, with support from teachers, should strive to identify their weaknesses and strengths and develop action plans to improve on them.

  • Formative Assessment:
    Build-in formative assessment with deep discussions. The goal is to analyze student answers and help students identify next steps.

    • Correct answers: Identify these as “mastered” concepts. Help students identify what strategies they employed that enabled them to master these concepts. Help students develop an action plan on how they will further challenge themselves (could be peer teaching, or attempting more challenging problems, etc…)
    • Incorrect answers: Work with student to identify the reasons for lack of mastery. They could be that she does not understand the concept, or needs to improve her studying strategy, or test taking skills. In any case, the teacher should help the student develop an action plan to address these areas of improvement.
  • Self assessment:
    Growth minded students have the ability to accurately assess their skills, which informs their analysis of their weaknesses, strengths and next steps on any task. Incorporate self-assessment in student learning to encourage students to practice this skill. Ideas:

    • Let students decide whether or not they mastered a concept (and later compare this to their performance)
    • Let students develop action plans to change behaviors/attitudes to enhance their performance on a specific task.
    • Let them decide how to spend “unstructured study time”, based on their areas of improvement.
  • Growth Mindset Assessment
    Building on the “Growth Mindset as a Learning Objective” design principle, we should develop assessment tools to measure students’ mindsets in order to inform instruction and school strategy.

2. Reward Systems: 
Grades can become a goal and hinder the development of a growth mindset get blocked once grades or “ranks” are in question. Include more than just “Mastery” grades in your rubric, such as:

  • Strategic Effort: How much effort has the student put? How much of that effort was intentional and informed, based on a careful process of self-exploration and planning?
  • Growth: How much the student has grown, both in terms of mastery and in terms of strategic effort.
  • Challenge: How much has the student challenged herself? Has she attempted risky/unfamiliar tasks? Has she raised the bar for herself?
  • Grit/Resilience: Does the student show persistence in face of failure/struggles?

3. Feedback

  • Praise for process not trait: Students should should be praised not only for mastery but also for challenge and strategic effort. They should not be praised for being “quick” or “smart”. While they need to understand their skill set, they should be aware that they need to develop other skills to achieve excellence.
  • Provide detailed feedback on where and how to improve:Constantly help them identify areas and strategies for growth.

4. Curriculum

  • Covers Content, Skills and Mindsets
  • Enables differentiation
  • Includes tasks where failure is necessary for learning. Design Thinking, Maker-inspired, Experimentation and Project-based tasks are great opportunities to do so.
  • Includes tasks that require practice to be mastered. Tasks like playing instruments or sports usually require practice, which helps level the playing field for students and develop their skills for working hard to hone a skill.
  • Emphasizes growth-minded role models. Curriculum should debunk the image of the “lonely genius” and accentuate the image of the consistent, collaborative hard worker.
  • Delayed gratification tasks. Such tasks can train students to not only seek the “rush of success” but also enjoy the process of getting there, without the need for constant validation.

5. Teacher training (PD)

  • Growth Mindset: Teachers should embody a growth mindset, believe in it and have the ability to teach it to students.
  • Self-awareness: A major part of a growth mindset is one’s ability to assess one’s skills and safely explore strengths, weaknesses, successes and failures. Our teachers should be coaches of self-awareness; helping our students develop the skills to explore their feelings and thoughts, and make action plans accordingly.
  • Deep content knowledge: Teachers will need to help struggling students by using different instructional strategies to address weaknesses. They will also need to help proficient students challenge themselves. Without a deep content understanding, the teacher will not be able to provide the safety nets needed for struggling students to develop a growth mindset, or the high bar required for proficient students to develop the growth mindset. Growth mindsets cannot be adopted if there’s no clear path for “growth”.
  • Differentiation: Linked to the previous point, teachers should have a strong ability to differentiate instruction and tasks.

6. Culture

  • Culture can be seen in the traditions, artifacts on the walls, events, etc… Growth mindset can be reflected through aspects such as: The Celebration of Failing Forward/Growth/Strategic Effort.
  • Engage Parents: Parents need to be incorporated into the culture through constant engagement, workshops, etc… to ensure their buy in and that the mindsets are being adopted and fostered at home as well.
  • Assessment and reward systems are a major part of the culture, discussed above.
  • Mottos:
    • “Explore Yourself”
    • “Stretch Yourself”
    • “Becoming is better than being”

Phew! that was a long post! Share away and follow me @EmanAbouelatta.


 


 

Excerpt from brainpickings book review: A “fixed mindset” assumes that our character, intelligence, and creative ability are static givens which we can’t change in any meaningful way, and success is the affirmation of that inherent intelligence, an assessment of how those givens measure up against an equally fixed standard; striving for success and avoiding failure at all costs become a way of maintaining the sense of being smart or skilled. A “growth mindset,” on the other hand, thrives on challenge and sees failure not as evidence of unintelligence but as a heartening springboard for growth and for stretching our existing abilities. Out of these two mindsets, which we manifest from a very early age, springs a great deal of our behavior, our relationship with success and failure in both professional and personal contexts, and ultimately our capacity for happiness.

Image retrieved from The Guardian.


2 Comments

Five Things Every Design Thinker Should Do

You’re a seasoned design thinker: you’ve attended the workshops, used the process, and even championed design thinking in your organization. Now, you’re ready to go to the next level: use it for long-term, high-impact projects with diverse teams. You’ll learn and fail (and that’s okay – that’s the point), but here are a few tips to help you go pro!

Designer

1. Flex the Process
Most design thinking workshops go through the 5 phases (Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, Test) in this order, with a certain approach to each phase. But the truth is: nether the order nor the approach of each phase is set in stone. In fact, you can hurt your project and your team by forcefully transitioning to a phase if its not what you need.

For example, if you have a great idea that you believe really meets your students’ needs: Prototype it and use the testing phase as your empathy exercise. Understand your users through their interaction with the experience, then interview them to gain a deeper insight into their needs and your solution. Use the prototype as a medium to gain empathy. The trick: Don’t get attached to the prototype, be open to redefining the need, and push yourself to re-imagine the solution.

flex the process You also want to treat your team as a user. What do we do for users? We design for their needs! So flex the process to meet your team’s needs, without sacrificing the integrity of the process. If the team is struggling with discovering an insight, you should encourage them to take a leap. But, if you try and try and try, and you can’t find anything, then maybe you should go back to Empathizing, with a new focus. The trick is to ensure that you’re mindful of how you’re flexing the process, why and for how long. Push really hard before you do it, and try everything. But if you believe that you are missing something, don’t move forward and lose momentum, go back and have another stab at it – a focused stab.

2. Build a d.Toolboxtoolbox
“What about the ideas we don’t choose? I don’t want to lose them!”. “How did we arrive at this prototype?”. “We’re in separate offices, how can we share out post-its?”.

D.thinking is a great process, but it doesn’t come without its challenges opportunities. What to do? Design a d.tool! A d.tool is a solution that will help you leverage d.thinking in the best way possible. It can be software (this app lets you capture an image of post it’s then digitally manipulate them: move them around, share them in a slide show, and clean up that wall!). A d.tool can also be an alternative way to approach a d.thinking phase: I created a d.tool called Crumbs which allows busy team members to test prototypes easily (more tools in later posts!). A d.tool can be a template that helps organize your thinking, or drive your actions: Maybe you can have a checklist to drive your brainstorming for interview questions. You’re a designer, and you have a need- D.ZINE!

3. Take a Breather
I LOVE the energy at design thinking workshops- especially at the d.school. I think it was one reason I got hitched: neon post it’s flying, music in the background, everyone standing/laughing/DOING. It’s invigorating! And it gets you to DO something – given how we’ve been trained to fear mistakes, to be too-in-our-heads, to spend too much time behind our desks and not with our users.

keep-calm-and-reflectBut sometimes you need to take a breather. Especially with longer term projects, with big teams – when the process isn’t as “clean”. You make decisions, take turns, go off track. Fast-pace is part ofthe d.thinking, but so is making decisions based on insight. Reflection is an important pillar: Was our brainstorm skewed to one direction? Should we roll back two steps and question an assumption? Is our work schedule benefiting the process? What can we do differently next time? Take some time to reflect on the process and outcomes, with an action oriented mindset. The keyword is: reflection-driven action, not just reflection.

4. Nurture the Designer
in you. Design thinking is genius in how it captures the user-centered design discipline in a way so accessible. And the good news is: there’s so many layers. Go deeper to be better. Talk to other practitioners or read a book! There are entire books written about synthesis and there are many techniques in creative thinking and ideation. The Stanford d.school (The Hasso Plattner Institute of Design) published a list of their favorite books on many topics from innovation management to a deep dive in Empathy to designing spaces. There are many fields around design thinking that you can leverage to become a better designer: creativity, product design, UX design, sketching, even negotiation!

4. Share your Wisdom
When we articulate our processes, we are forced to refine and critique them. But more importantly, we are motivated to search for patterns, think of extreme cases and consider concerns that others may have on them. This thought process makes us better designers. I just shared 5 tips – Your turn to share ONE. Blog it, Tweet it or write it on a napkin. Share the knowledge in the comments section or @EmanAbouelatta on twitter.


1 Comment

d.Tool: CRUMBS

*d.Tools are solutions that help d.thinkers leverage the design thinking process to its fullest.

crumbs

WHY use CRUMBS?

You use CRUMBS to quickly test parts of your prototype as opposed to always testing it as a whole. This is helpful when you need to: deal with limited time, isolate variables or make quick progress.

  1. If you have an elaborate prototype that can only be tested next week, you can pick small parts of it and test them separately through out this wait period.
  2. If you’re not sure why your prototype fell apart in testing, divide it into crumbs and test each to identify the stuck points.
  3. And, if your team is overwhelmed with having to create a big prototype, have them create and test crumbs instead, thus creating a momentum of “little wins” that arms them for the big prototype.

HOW to use CRUMBS?

Start with determining what the separable parts of your prototype are. Perhaps you are designing students’ first day of school, where the “separable parts” would be: walking into school, meeting other students, attending orientation and having lunch.

Then, consider how you can divide these parts into crumbs that are small, yet will provide meaningful answers when tested. In doing so, consider not only the core things you’re testing but also the small decisions you’re making along the way. For example, one crumb could be: “getting to the assembly room, where the orientation is”. The question we’re trying to answer would be: “how do we best help students find the assembly room?” Although this is not a major concern in your bigger endeavor of designing the first day of school, it is part of the day, and therefore is worth designing! Crumbs can help you make the decision on how to “help people find the room” easily, and in a user-centered manner.

Finally, think of how you’ll prototype and test the crumb, regardless of your bigger prototype. For example, you can tell your friend to meet you at the assembly room, and send her directions on email. Then try it with another friend using signage. This way, you get useful insights without worrying about the big prototype! And, you don’t even disrupt your day!


TIP:

Crumbs should be testable with minimal setup, in less than 10 minutes.



Leave a comment

Why We Should Design The School

Last year I helped a start-up school design its first two weeks of school. Our initial problem statement was: How Might We reflect the school values in these two weeks? We talked to organizations that have strong cultures and asked them: what was your orientation like? We came up with awesome activities, and went on to prototype them. However, the moment we actually spoke to the students, we realized we were totally off.

Emma, a quirky, social eighth grader, came into the prototyping room. We started with a ‘stoke’ activity where we all yell our name with an accompanying dance move (part of our prototype, and a way to set the energy in the room), but she wouldn’t participate. I noticed her looking over her shoulder; glancing at the corridor filling up with students going to lunch. I walked up to the door and closed it. “Thank you!” she said, letting go a sigh of relief. And in my head I thought “Duh!”. We’ve all been there; a teenager, self-conscious about what she does in fear of being labeled uncool. We took a detour from our prototype, and spoke to Emma about how she would feel if she had to do that activity in the beginning of the first day of school, and more importantly: how she feels about starting high school. She said she was anxious about finding the right friends, and was going to miss her middle school friends. She was scared of the notion of high school – the amount of work, and the stakes.

We hadn’t considered her needs.

I went on to ask people: “What aspects of your school experience do you most remember?” Academics always come up, usually spurring a wave of emotions “I always felt validated” was something I recently heard, when another person jumped in and said “I felt exactly the opposite of that”. But academics aren’t the only thing people recall- in fact, most people will emphasize extracurricular activities, life-time friendships, navigating the social network, testing notions of authority, finding their interests, discovering themselves, or not being able to be themselves.

School is not just the academics.

In most schools, most of the design work goes into the curriculum. Teachers are by definition designers: they are focused on the students’ needs, they differentiate and personalize instruction, they continuously seek ways of engaging their students. In a way, teachers are designers of the academic learning experience. However, this is usually the only part of the school experience that is intentionally designed. But the School is ripe with experiences and processes waiting to be designed. For example, the parent-teacher conference. What’s the impact it has on the students? Is its format the best way to discuss student progress? Can we leverage technology to deepen the communication channels between teachers and families? Another example is space: How can we leverage it to drive behavior? Even the core of learning can be designed: Does our current model of assessment align with our values?

Even when the school is designed to encourage certain values (like creativity or a growth mindset), we often don’t consider how the whole school will be designed to reflect, encourage, and scaffold these values. If the school wants to nurture self direction in students, how will it design the roles of teachers, parents and staff to best align with this goal? If the school encourages innovation, how will it continuously innovate? What’s the system/process it will put in place for innovation? If the school aspires to have students who feel deep belonging to the school, how will it achieve so?

There is a great opportunity to Design the School.

It is not so much about drastically redesigning the school, but rather, it’s about intentionally designing the different parts that make a school so that they can address the needs of the users in the school, leverage the technologies and possibilities of today and the future, and therefore help the school succeed.

In a nutshell, these are my design principals:

  • The dynamics of the School Experience (and therefore the user needs) are about much more than the academics or even school values. We should design for these dynamics.
  • School Values should be evident and nurtured through every part of the school, not just the curriculum.
  • The School should be an ultimately user-centered experience. It should seek to identify unmet needs and continuously innovate to meet them.
  • The design challenge can be sparked by User Needs, School Values, School Strategy and/or School Activities – explicit and implicit.

My answer to this need? I became a School Experience Designer. I help schools develop and perfect their user experiences, build innovation capacity and culture, and develop systems for continuous need-finding and innovation. I use an array of tools: design thinking, qualitative/quantitative research, user-centered design, organizational theory, research in education, my MA in Education Leadership, my background in program management and strategy, and good old research.

What is your answer?